Saturday, 22 December 2012

Martin Banned!!! ‘Pornogate’ Councillor Disqualified From Public Office

Residents of Oakham breathed a sigh of relief when a High Court Judge disqualifed Oakham Town Councillor Martin Brookes from holding public office either in Oakham or anywhere else after disgusting the town in an incident known locally as ‘Pornogate’.

The story as it appeared in the Rutland Mercury
Standards for England, the body responsible for maintaining standards in public office, took Cllr Brookes before a Tribunal after a string of complaints against him by fellow councillors, staff and members of the public.  The Tribunal found that Cllr Brookes had been guilty of a large number of breaches of the Code of Conduct, calling one councilllor an ‘arsehole’, another an ‘old bag’ and ‘vilifying’ the Clerks on numerous occasions.  He also subjected a female member of the public he had never met to a tirade of homophobic abuse.

However, the worst incident by far was when Brookes, who is a keen amateur photographer, broke open the Council’s main noticeboard in the High Street and filled it with anal fetish material which promptly led to Brookes’s arrest and cautioning and subsequent downfall at the Standards Tribunal.

Mobile phone video of the incident sent to Laughing Stocks by a member of the public confirms reports widely circulating in the town that the images showed a naked man with a carrot engaging in what can only be described as cruelty to vegetables!

Mystery surrounds the identity of the model in the photographs, but the images taken by a member of the public clearly show one of the pictures was captioned “This is my ex-husband, I shouldn’t really show it round – he’s got the one of me”.

Stills from a video of the noticeboard.  The full horror of the scene has had to be deliberately blurred out by us!

In his final adjudication Presiding Judge David Laverick said of Cllr Brookes: “There is no indication that the Respondent has shown any sign of understanding the standards set by the Code of Conduct despite his agreeing to follow the provisions of that Code. The Tribunal can see no alternative to disqualifying him from being a member of the Town Council, and any other local authority. The Tribunal has decided that the period of disqualification should be two years. That period will allow the particular Town Council to move to a more normal way of operating and will also allow the Respondent time to reflect on the standards which are expected of those in Public Life."
As well as the Pornogate incident, Brookes has also gained notoriety for a series of other bizarre doings.  His crazy antics have included:

-         Sending a press release to all UK national media organisations saying his ex was ‘crap’
-         Proclaiming himself ‘God’s gift to men’
-         Saying that he would never shoplift in Oakham because the up-market shops have nothing he wants
-         Claiming that if women get cancer it is their own fault

It has been reported that ex- Cllr Brookes is trying to appeal against Judge Laverick's opinion that he is "unfit for public office".  We don't fancy his chances much!

Saturday, 15 December 2012

The Fool in the Cherry Picker – Or Just Trespassing?

More Streets And Suburbia (S.A.S.) Gossip from your Rutland Roving Reporters!

The Fool in the Cherry Picker – Or Just Trespassing?

You know - if somebody purported to be a local journalist or photographer and walked uninvited around my business premises with a camera around his neck, and a suspicious smile on his face, I’d probably ask him to leave.  But then again the same person may well be a little frightening because of his attitude, general appearance and the way he speaks to me, so as a frail person I might just cower behind the counter and let him wander, especially when he has a bouncer with him.  Not that his protective person is that conspicuous, by design, so I might not see him or her, (lurking in the background), whichever the case may be.  But that’s just meek and mild me I suppose.

Anyway the photos on his recent Internet publication are somewhat confusing.  Some pictures show an unfinished roof on a small building in a back yard (picture taken from altitude with telephoto lens) which seems to please him and yet another picture shows another roof, with rather expensive roof tiles I might add, on a particularly nice period building.  For some reason he dislikes these tiles so we must assume he is an aesthetics critic or a building know-it-all. He does appear to have a fetish with roofs'. How odd.  Perhaps it remands him of his own 'topper' and has a grievance with his barber.

We then came to wonder how he got these pictures.  Was it from a cherry picker hired for the occasion or did he, as is the suspicion, wander around uninvited into a building and then disappear up to somebody’s bedroom at the top of the house to look for a photo opportunity?  He has to be the worst kind of paparazzi who uses deception to secure entry and then hides in the ‘clouds’ like some US surveillance drone who then monitors the enemy below.  How much does it cost to hire a cherry picker these days – me thinks this is not the case as he always claims he has no money to eat let alone hire a cherry picker.  How on earth does he cover the cost of phone calls and new equipment?  Amazing what you can afford on benefits these days isn’t it.  

Questions, questions.  Something this local l...y dislikes intensely.

On the same day the pompous ass has the gall to claim that somebody, other than he, is guilty of “...malicious communications...” Now that is rich coming from him.  I suppose he is now a legal expert because he’s been getting away with the same thing for years.  Not to mention the other offences he has committed with impunity over the past ten years – and counting.

We are also treated to a history lesson of other instances in people’s pasts that he has mined from the Internet.  Wouldn’t it be a travesty if we found something in his past that he didn’t want airing in public?

Okay all you budding Arthur Scargill’s, let’s get digging.

Oh nearly forgot - Merry Christmas. Ho Ho Ho.


Saturday, 20 October 2012

From Malice to Malarkey

This is your ‘Rutland Roving Reporter’ back again with more salacious gossip from the ‘Streets And Suburbia.’ (Known in certain circles as ‘S.A.S.’).

At the risk of being perceived as a plagiarist I have to bring to your attention an article from our county’s most balanced publication, ‘The Rutland Times’ (18/10/12; page 3 – certain names have been withheld to protect the innocent) in which it mentions a disturbance at a recent meeting of Oakham Town Council’s Parks and Planning Committee.  The paper reports that an un-named person was removed by “officers” after refusing to leave the meeting.  This was due to the person’s strong objections to a decision being made at the meeting. The meeting had to be adjourned because of the apparent outrageous actions from the individual who gave the chairman no option but to ask for the intervention of the police and halt the proceedings.   

Now, you may think that that could be the prerogative of an individual in a democracy (freedom of speech and all that malarkey) but after further investigation it appears that this is not the first time certain ‘individuals’ have disrupted meetings at the Town Council and at that ‘other place’ down the road.  At a recent meeting at that ‘other place’ it seems that there were unwarranted interventions by individuals who thought that they were the only people who needed to be heard. Even as they held up badly written signs, (that looked as though they had been done by a two year old), they still persisted to show little or no respect for the rule of law and not an iota of respect for people elected to act on their behalf in local governance.  My apologies for the reference to two year olds, after all they could have done far better.  

Ignorance is the word that springs to mind and it would appear that their actions on that evening left three council members no alternative but to leave halfway through the meeting out of embarrassment and disgust at the antics and comments from the individuals concerned. Their names don’t appear to be on any minutes or any reference made as yet, except in anecdotal evidence, but I guess we know who they are. And we wouldn’t want to write anything we couldn’t support without proof, unlike false reports often blogged by he who shall not be named.

Could it be that the same people are committing these near felonious acts at strategic venues or is there a band of professional disruptors doing the rounds in Rutland at every opportunity?  This reporter has no evidence that there has been disruption at meetings in the villages around our county town, or even at meetings in that other town down the road, so we can only assume that they have difficulty with transport, funds for taxis or even no transport of their own that would enable them to travel the country at will.  Mind you it seems not to hinder one particular individual who pops up just about everywhere and even eats out at expensive notable ‘posh’ Tory backed restaurants south of Bedford.  They say the nachos and roast pork are particularly good but better with apple sauce – if you can get it before the waitress decides you look a bit too shifty and dishevelled to eat there. 

The problem of the kind of disruption mentioned above is becoming prolific from what our team of researchers has discovered with the culprits being identifiable for being of a dishevelled and unkempt appearance.  I would suggest that the organisers of the demonstrations around the country on Saturday 20th in protest against austerity measures in the UK be very aware of people described as ‘unkempt and dishevelled’ with one of them carrying a camera and the other a broom. It might be that they will attempt to hijack the demo and turn it into a farce.  They’re good at that. 

It could however be a problem solved if the suggestion from the letter’s page (18/10/12; p.8) of the Rutland Times is to be taken up by RCC.  The suggestion from the writer is to move the council offices from Catmose to Ashwell and sell the current offices as a “...swish hotel” by a “responsible private company.”  That would be a good idea because the disruptive element would have to travel at night (the broom would come in handy if it is a tandem) and without any visible means of support or transport they would be stuck in Oakham with only one target for their indignation and ill temper. 

Finally there is the a suggestion that the individual who is being disruptive has the talent for suggesting that anybody who does something for charity is fair game for his attention, in the most despicable way.  Let’s not forget of course that the only charitable action he has ever been involved in is when he bought himself a train ticket from London to Rutland some 9 years ago.  Apparently the main reason he is here is because that’s all he had left from the handout from a church in London who needed to pay him off before he administered his own brand of coup de grace based on bluff, elasticity of the truth and fear. What a shame he didn’t have a few more ‘quid’ in ‘compo’ then he could have gone all the way to that phallic heaven he admires so much – Hoy!

For the next instalment of 'SAS' tune in again soon to Laughing Stocks, I have a sneaking suspicion it might be sooner rather than later.

Tuesday, 9 October 2012

Train Your Underdog

It’s no use constantly complaining about your underdog, you just haven’t got him trained right!  

For only £71( which is just one week’s dole money!) let Barbara Woodhouse show you how to tame your errant beast by getting your underdog trained.  Includes answers to the following typical underdog problems:

My underdog just won’t stop whining!

My underdog shows no interest in the pussy next door, is there something wrong with him?

My underdog has bad breath!

My underdog keeps shitting on his own doorstep!

My underdog is always begging me for food!

My underdog is addicted to porn!
My underdog can't tell the difference between shopping and shoplifting!

My underdog disrupts public meetings!

Wednesday, 3 October 2012

The Betrayal of Helen Pender

In a hysterically funny piece, Rutland & Melton Parliamentary Candidate Helen Pender accuses her 'underdog' of biting her, calls him a 'hypocrite' and accuses him of cyberstalking and posting malicious comments against her.

"A series of destructive and dangerous posts have been left on web sites connected to Martin Brookes... Last night another dangerous and destructive posting was made on the web.  Martin Brookes pretending, I now believe, to be upset, sent me a text at 11.30 pm asking [me] to call him.  I walked up to Oakham police station [and] we went back to his computer and looked up the email we had sent earlier in the day.  It had been undeliverable and was not sent.  I wrote out the name of the email and password for Martin to access the email address we had sent the missive from.  I cannot now access that email address and suspect the password has been changed.  I did try to change the password but was unable to.

I am now beginning to wonder whether Martin Brookes has been complicit in this war of cyber stalking I have suffered, usually on his websites, since 2009.

I sent Martin Brookes the following email earlier today after he had rewritten history on his own blog.  Frankly the sense of betrayal one feels at his behaviour does hurt, but I intend to find out precisely who has been making such malicious and damaging posts in my name.  I hope Martin Brookes has betrayed me for the last time.

Accused by Helen of "cyberstalking" & "malicious postings"

Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 13:17:59
From: Helen Pender
Subject: Your malicious postings.
To: Martin Brookes

You Martin were with me when that email address was set up and have now changed the password to that email address so that I cannot even access it.  You were a party to an attempt to get the person we suspected of placing malicious postings on the internet in our name to stop and that was the point of that email.  If the person replied then you would be able to check the IP address and that is why you wanted to check that email address at your home last night. - or so you said.  What we saw was that the email was not delivered and came back as undeliverable, I can only assume that you resent it since then.  I now note that you have changed the email address of sxxxxxx@xxxxxxx and now suspect that it is you who has been posting these malicious comments.  Talk about a hypocrite - you were a party to the email sent yesterday, you checked it on your computer at home yesterday after you rang me at 11.30 in the evening when you claimed to be so upset.  I am now beginning to wonder whether it is you who has deliberately posted all the rubbish in my name.

I had never seen the comment I saw on your own website last night.  The only email I sent to you today was from this account and I have never used that account before or since.  I tried to get in today to change the password, just in case you intended to misuse that email address, for which I gave you the password and it seems you have changed the details so that I can no longer change the password.  So, in effect it is now your email address.


Pe[r]haps I should stop feeling sorry for people and stop trying to champion the underdog.  Why is it that those whom you try to help so often bite you?  By championing the underdog you seem to get viciously bitten and injured.  Lesson learnt perhaps."

"Viciously bitten"

Legal Disclaimer

Reposted entirely using materials put in the public domain by the author, so sod off!  Think before you post!

Sunday, 30 September 2012

The Ratland Rant

We are pleased to report there was a happy ending to this when the Bank Of Ireland kindly put her out of her misery and repossessed her house!  We hope she is very happy in her new home.  Wherever that is.

Legal Disclaimer

Reposted entirely using materials put in the public domain by the author, so sod off!  Think before you post!

Monday, 17 September 2012

Roving Report No 2

The OLS team received the following contribution:

Hello ‘Stocks,’ as promised from your last post we’ll keep them coming.  Round 2 of contributions from ‘The Rutland Roving Reporter’ who has come across even more misunderstandings by a local blogger:  
From ‘A Load of Bollards’ to a ‘Load of Bullocks.’  It seems our erstwhile Rutland self styled saviour has done it again.  Well, perhaps it was to be expected after all he has been somewhat quiet of late.  Probably because of the threat of further prosecution, which previously the CPS decided not to pursue on that occasion on the grounds that the evidence needed to be more accurate in its presentation.   Not guilty he maintained – well I’ll leave that your own judgement.
His recent attack on someone, and something, that he knows absolutely nothing about (driving and keeping quiet) has left the egg squarely, or rather ‘mushily,’ on his face yet again.  He has a well known propensity for miss-quoting the law by maintaining that it is wrong, on this occasion, to accept the punishment. It was of course within the law to do so.  If anyone should know what it is like to ‘not accept punishment or responsibility’ then surely it is he. Has he ever accepted either punishment or responsibility?
Yes, he criticised someone for actually admitting they’d done wrong and who took their punishment in a very brave way.  The person in question went to classes about road safety, (shock, horror they were caught speeding along with millions of others) and went back to basics to learn how to put it right.  Not having ever attended these classes I can only surmise that they are quite humiliating and as a punishment it is far better than trawling first time offenders through the courts and all the expense that that entails. 
I admit to being no expert but hey, a brave person if you ask me.  And to put it in the public domain like they did serves as a reminder to us all that it is so easy to transgress. But of course our ‘erstwhile’ local blogger has never transgressed. Or has he? Perhaps a little research into his past might prove fruitful. 
Another example of this blogger meddling into areas of no concern to him was the attempt to cover his tracks when he made an accusation regarding the attendance of a local photographer doing his job at a charity function recently.  A reliable source tells me that he attended the function having claimed no expenses or gratuities at all.  I believe that is charity isn’t it? Well done that man, you should hold your head up high and we’ll endeavour to get a medal struck you.
The blogger always makes a feeble attempt to ‘covers his tracks’ by saying it was somebody else’s fault that he got the ‘duff’ information he posts for all to see.  Not to mention the fact that he usually says it came from a ‘member of the public.’  How many people actually speak to him?  There can’t be that many otherwise he would have some support locally, which doesn’t seem to be the case.  Who would want to engage in conversation with him anyway!  (Bad breath I believe, even at a distance)
So, to finalise this latest short report on our local ..... let’s examine the truth shall we?
A person who, like millions of others, makes a mistake in life and pays for it by volunteering for some instruction into how they went wrong.  Admirable of them to do so, I think.  The person involved honestly exposes themselves to ridicule and condemnation from  somebody who doesn’t even drive or hold a license and won’t get a job to contribute to society and perhaps better themselves.  The blogger has no shame or remorse for his wrong doings because he is himself lacking in many areas.
He made up a story about a charity event that he thinks is something of shindig for spongers.  What he neglects to see is that they have the right to do this in our democratic society.  He tries to imply that St Georges Barracks is behind it and then has the audacity to say it wasn’t his fault he got it all wrong but some mythical being in the ether that is sending these messages to him by telepathy or better still by some message system that gets him to emergency incidents, fire, police or ambulance as they happen, no matter where in the county.  He must be telegraphic, or have somebody on the inside.  Mmmmmm.
That’s it for ‘Stocks’ I’ll be back soon when our transgressor transgresses again, which won’t be long I bet.

Friday, 7 September 2012

Oakham Councillor Puts Porno in Town Noticeboard

The arresting officer perusing Cllr Brookes' porno display

Lunchtime shoppers in Oakham High Street got more than an eyeful when Oakham Town Councillor Martin Brookes forced open the town noticeboard and displayed a shocking portfolio of hard core porno!

He then proceeded to encourage passers by, regardless of age, to admire the pictures!  Needless to say Cllr Brookes was arrested at the scene and taken away by the police.

Inspector Monks of Oakham Police station told the Rutland Mercury  “It’s not nice if people use a public notice board to display offensive pictures and I won’t tolerate it.”

The bizarre selection of pornographic images portrayed a practical demonstration of a little known fringe fetish known as vegetable sodomy which is usually confined to groups who don’t have access to proper sex toys such as prison inmates and long-term unemployed.

After his release by the police, Cllr Brookes, who hasn’t worked in years, said “The Assistant Town Clerk said it did not portray a good image for Oakham.  My answer is that it is a minority of the people residing in Oakham who feel they can treat me in this disgusting manner”.  Later on Cllr Brookes stated on his blog: ”I am told if I went to a special school I should be excluded from being a Councillor. I don't think this is correct. If I am charged and convicted for display offensive images it may come out I was charged as a young man for petty theft.”

He later accepted a police caution for the offences of criminal damage and displaying offensive images, though he refused to say who it was who was in the pictures with the carrot.  All that is known about the person in the pictures is that he was male and blonde.

Brooksy, who is male and blonde, also outraged Oakham residents by his refusal to pay the repair bill for the criminal damage he caused because he is unemployed, even though he is a regular in Oakham’s pubs.

In November 2011 Cllr Brookes was found to be wholly unfit to be a councillor and was disqualified from holding any public office.

Thursday, 23 August 2012

A Load of Bollards: Two-faced Brookesy caught out by Neighbour

Stirring disgraced ex-councillor Martin Brookes has been caught out being two faced by his neighbour who has found out that it was Brookes who has been making complaints about him to the Council.  Watch him squirm as he tries in vain to wriggle off the hook!  We are grateful to our local correspondent for this contribution, keep them coming!

A Load of Bollards
Brookesy upsets another local retailer with his individual perception of public service.

Yes this correspondent can report again on the 'Rutland Misfit' who has again incorrectly reported on another local issue.  This time his target is a local retailer who erected 'Bollards' outside his store as a safety measure after a vehicle ".....drove into the waste bin outside the shop." The store is only yards away from where Brookes lives so there is a fair chance this might be another retail store he won't be welcome in.

Brookes admits that he took photos and then immediately fled to safety in the South of England to avoid confrontation with the populace of Rutland, which is always the way with this individual.

It would appear that the store owner has a suspicion about who made the complaint to RCC Planning Department and there is a mountain of evidence that points straight at Brookes.

On his infamous and one-sided inaccurate blog, Brookes says that it wasn't him, but it is common knowledge he hides his identity before he makes any phone calls so that his number is not recorded on the receiving land line or mobile phone.  "The caller did not leave their number," is the only message you might get when he phones you, says nothing and then hangs up.

Brookes then goes on to say, "As for the Councillor involved I think they stink!"  That's a rich statement from him as it is a known fact that Brookes' severe onset of halitosis, since he chose to reduce his own income some years ago by volunteering to be unemployed and now can't afford the basics for his personal hygiene.  As a consequence his health is suffering which leaves him with very bad breath and hair loss.

The blog entry is full of contradictions and because of considerable research done by this correspondent with local people, particularly around the store and Brookes’ home, can report that there is a general feeling of disbelief in anything Brookes reports on.  In street interviews held, while he was hiding in the South, a resident said, "Brookes? Oh him, no we don't have anything to do with him.  He's a loaner and we keep out of his way.” Another resident I spoke to was less complimentary but her comments cannot be printed because of offending other readers.

This correspondent is looking closely into Brookes's activities and will make more reports when appropriate.  In the meantime the public should avoid contact.

T. Ruth (Your Local Heralder @

From on Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Bollards Rutland County Council Planning and Willow Stores

Willow Stores


At the weekend whilst away, I received the above Facebook message from Willow Stores Oakham

Before I went away I photographed the new concrete bollards outside the store highlighting the reason for the installation on a previous blog post.

At no point until now did I say I did not like the concrete bollards and I most certainly did not raise a complaint with Rutland County County Councils Planning Officer.

The Bollards have now been removed because Rutland County Councils Planning Officers have nothing better to do.

The bollards have been replaced with Cherry Trees, The owner of Willow Stores has been told planning permission would be required for bollards on a commercial property boundary but not if it was a residential property Trees do not need planning permission.

As for the Councillor involved I think they stink!

The other problem here is the council some years  ago removed the public footpath to create a parking bay.

It does not surprise me a complaint was received because many members of the public would assume the pavement they use every day is public, when it is actually private and their stupid council dug up the public footpath for the benefit of motorists.

Thursday, 16 August 2012

Blogger Martin Throws Tantrum After Forgetting His Password

Oh dear! Compulsive Oakham blogger and disgraced ex-councillor Martin Brookes forgot his password this week and is throwing a major tantrum in the town.  Refusing to admit that he just couldn’t remember his own password he insists that it’s all a conspiracy by Oakham Town Council, Rutland County Council and, of course, the police!  It also appears that Brookes has been using the town council’s email address as a log-in for his foul language blog even after he was banned from being a councillor!  What a disgrace!

"Blog Hacking and Oakham Town Council
On  Monday this week for a short period of time I lost control of my blog.

It was also deleted.

With the use of my mobile and security questions and I was able to republish my blog.

This morning I found my password was not working.

I then requested an e-mail reminder. I was shocked to see Google were sending the email with a reminder to an Oakham Town Council email account.

I telephoned Oakham Town Council and spoke to the assistant clerk. She said she would look into it.

A short time later I received a telephone from the Clerk, he said he had personally received an email from the blogger team.

I asked the Clerk to forward the email to me so this breach could be investigated.

He said he would delete the email, he also said he wanted nothing to do with this.

He did forward the e-mail shown below, once received I was able to reset my password once again.

I know Oakham Town Council and Rutland County council and its supporters would like to see my blog removed for good. They have tried using Leicestershire Constabulary now it appears they happy to hack Google accounts." 

Friday, 10 August 2012

The Titanium Chastity Belt contd

We left our titanium chastity belt wearing heroine at Leicester station on her romantic date with recently released ‘HIV positive psychopath’ sex offender Kevin [real name Dale].  Luckily our heroine survived this terrifying encounter to continue her fight for survival against the masonic henchmen.  Here she tells how she got the sack from her teaching job, sued the Duke of Kent in a disastrous lawsuit but still feels confident enough to reassure us she's not "one of those nuts who think the whole world is a conspiracy against them."

Kevin said he had been released without completing many of the courses designed to rehabilitate and change the cognitive skills of sex offenders.  If true, then not only was my life in danger, but the lives of whole communities are also at risk. Is this justifiable collateral damage?

Lord Lucan
From TS Eliot to date divorcing women of powerful men have long been subjected to efforts to paint them mad, bad or both. The most high profile cases are those of Lady Lucan, who was successfully painted as quite mad. It seems that since the murder of Sandra Rivett divorcing men have not been told where and when their wives will be eradicated. I suspect that Lord Lucan, knowing his wife was soon to be killed, had an attack of conscience, when he should have had an inalienable alibi at the Claremont Club. In a desperate effort to countermand his wife’s demise he rushed to the house on a night the nanny was due to be out. It is surely too absurd to believe that Lord Lucan himself would have mistaken the nanny for his own wife?   Lady Tryon, whose embarrassing letters to Prince Charles were apparently being used to gain an equitable divorce settlement, denied having thrown herself from the third floor of a private mental hospital. Operations Paget and Aberton have no hope of uncovering any sort of real truth whilst the enquiries are staffed with members of secret societies.
Princess Di
I have no personal knowledge of the death of the Princess of Wales. Like everyone else I merely read what is written in the papers. However the attempts to salaciously denigrate her personal life whenever questions about her death arise would appear to me to allow her death to go largely unexamined on grounds of good taste. There are too many questions which remain unasked for any of us to rest easy about her death. Reports that she was ‘in the last stages of paranoid dementia’ have gained currency since she has not been alive to show them to be entirely unjustified.

Drug Running, Fraud, Embezzelment & Child Abuse
Why on earth should I shut up? Plots to paint me as a drug runner, fraudster, embezzler and latterly child abuser have all failed. In the face of such malevolence the only defence is to speak out. Scandal mongering is rife in my life. Off the record briefings given to manipulate innocent individuals are never reported back – because it would be a betrayal of trust. Efforts to criminalise me or make me insane abound with the aim of depriving me of a sane voice carrying integrity. When one trips over the dirt on the establishment carpet one just gets brushed under the carpet and trodden down. No effort is made to clean up the mess which is rapidly destroying our society.

The Sack
Noticing that a very pretty student was introducing girls in my class to a group of older men I alerted the deputy head to a possible paedophile ring which could be using the pretty girl as an unwitting procuress. We had a positive conversation about the role of secret organisations in protecting child abusers amongst their members. She had some personal knowledge of an MP who, whilst he did what he was told, had access to children ‘who didn’t matter’. A few days later I met a very sullen faced deputy head determined to sack me. It seems she had been told I was a possible child abuser – the best form of defence being attack – the secret societies turn the tables to ensure the focus is not on their members who perpetrate crime, but on innocents who blow the whistle on their crimes. Nothing was done to prosecute the man who made this student pregnant.
The Lawsuit Against The Duke of Kent
Fed up with the whispering campaign I then felt my only defence would be to sue. The case was considered by Master Leslie, Judges Pitchers and Richards in the High Court in London. Master Leslie was only willing to let me sue the deputy head, a non-mason. A typical Masonic ruse. Let the non-masons destroy one another in a court battle whilst leaving the real perpetrators free to continue their malicious and sinister tactics. All the masons cited were ruled out by the High Court. Judge Pitchers is a known mason, Judge Richards refused to confirm or deny if he had ever been or was a mason.  Under the Human Rights Act he had to answer that question. I was satisfied that his refusal to answer the question meant that he could not deny an association with the Masonic movement, so had no right to sit on a case which identified known masons and the Masonic movement as perpetrators of long term harassment, psychological torture albeit vain torture and pecuniary malice. Master Leslie asked if I had suffered mental damage from these experiences and assured me, that since I had no history of mental ill health, I had no case to bring. This is patently false I have suffered and continue to suffer pecuniary damage, harassment and slander. What Master Leslie neglected to say however is that had I succumbed to efforts to make me insane I would also have no case to bring, since my testimony would be flawed by having had a history of distorted thinking. Catch 22. Master Leslie’s judgement is appended. He acted outside the law in making a finding in a case of slander without a jury trial and his obfuscation in changing my suit for information applied for under the Data Protection Act to pre-trial disclosure is not an error. Master Leslie has contributed to that bible of civil litigation ‘Atkins’ and is incapable of such a manifestly basic error.

 Original Documentation
A writ taken out against agents of the Masonic movement (including the Duke of Kent!) for Negligence and failure to comply with due care and diligence to Employment Law and defamation contrary to the Defamation Acts.

Mr Shaun W**********, Deputy Head Special Needs Teaching & Student Support Service, Leicester City Council, New Parks House, Pindar Road, Leicester, LE3 9RN.

Mrs Wendy S******, The Key Way School, Carisbrooke Gardens, Leicester.(Governor)

Kevin L****, HMP Whatton, HMP Whatton, Whatton, Nottingham NG13 9FQ,

Len T*******, Court Official, Loughborough and Melton Magistrates Courts. 

Guy G******, Legal Services, for Leicester City Council, Town Clerk’s and Corporate Resources Legal Services, Welford Place, Leicester, East Midlands LE1 6ZG.

The Duke of Kent, as leader of the Masonic movement, Kensington Palace,
Kensington Palace Gardens, London W8.

The basis of my claim is set out in the following account of my working life and the illustrations of harassment, slander, bullying and inhumane actions perpetrated by those cited in this writ and their failure to protect me from the excesses of their organisations, their own actions and their failure to accept the statutory and Human Rights I have as a citizen of the United Kingdom. For these offences I seek damages and punitive damages.

Wendy S****** of The Keyway Centre, has let it be known to R***** K***, and I presume other members of staff and possibly pupils, that I am suspected of some sort of paedophilia or child abuse. These allegations are a direct result of the harassment I have suffered at the hands of those who have for at least the last decade sought to silence my testimony about the corrupt practices I uncovered before, during and after my divorce proceedings. A line needs to be drawn in the sand to stop unfounded rumour and innuendo placing me within the power of those who are able to manufacture evidence to convict me of some sort of heinous crime. The core attributes of my personality are being threatened and this defamatory accusation will seep into the crevasses of the subconscious of those who have been so briefed, causing ripples to gain an every wider acceptance of this wholly malign rumour

A jury award for defamation is ‘prescribed by law’ under Article 10 of the
 Human Rights Act and my ability to live a life without further harassment false innuendo and malicious rumour is enshrined in Article 6 of the Human Rights Act.

I wrote to Shaun W********** of Leicester City Council, requesting
 information as to his enquiry about my summary dismissal. He has declined to answer any of my most recent letters or provide me with any written data – contrary to the Data Protection Act. I have now been effectively charged and found guilty, of accusations of which I am still not fully informed, with absolutely no input into those accusations or the events which led to my summary dismissal. Under the Human Rights Act, (article 6) Leicester City Council’s obfuscation and silence has continued amongst a growing climate of rumour and innuendo being perpetrated against my person.

The actions of Kevin L****, as an agent in the Masonic or other allied
movement, in overseeing the danger I was placed in whilst working at Whatton Prison and then using the efforts I made to avert that danger to vilify me further have contributed to my harassment and are in contravention of Article 6 of the Human Rights Act.

Len T******’s involvement in encouraging harassment of me whilst working for the Witness Service at Melton Mowbray Magistrates’ Court is also I believe a factor in gaining his legal influence in any case I might bring, and has continued long after leaving my post at Melton Mowbray, as an agent and member of the Free Masons or whatever the initiated members prefer to call themselves.

Both Leicester City Council and the Masons have colluded in denying me Human Rights under Articles 6 and 10 of the Human Rights Act.

The Judge’s Verdict!
Text of Judicial Decision of Master Leslie Stamped 18 July 2003
In the High Court of Justice HQ03X01427
Queen’s Bench Division
Master Leslie
Date: 11 July 2003


Helen Patey Claimant


Shaun W********** and others Defendant

It is ordered that:

1) In claims against Shaun W**********, Kevin L**** (The Home Office), Len T******, Guy G****** (save as in paragraph 3 below) and the Duke of Kent/The Masonic Movement, lift the stay and the claims be struck out with Judgement for the Defendants.

2) Claim against Wendy S****** stayed; Claimant, to present to Master Leslie draft Particulars of Claim as hereunder.

3) Claim against Guy G****** for Leicester City Council under the D.P.A. 1997 be stayed; Claimant, to present to Master draft Particulars of Claim as hereunder.

4) Claimant to attend before Master Leslie in room E119 on 6th August 2003 at 11.30 am (during Practice) with draft Particulars of Claim.
Telephone Harassment
Telephoning Rosemary E***** after the case I expressed my disappointment at her husband’s attempts to conspire to kill me. She said she understood how wronged I must feel but she had nothing to do with it. I pointed out that shortly after completing the play in the prison she had visited me and suggested that I take in students from a local boarding school, she would act as an oral referee. She must have heard that I had given the prisoner my phone number – secrets are impossible to keep in prisons. Her suggestion, which I immediately rejected, meant that she was now implicated in putting innocent boarders at the school, with foreign parents, in danger. 
Masonic Psychiatry!
What heinous crime had I committed? What was my original sin? I had saved my then husband from the ‘treatment’ being meted out to him by a Masonic psychiatrist, and the only explanation for the inhuman treatment he suffered at the hands of Doctor David T******* was that he was being subjected to some sort of unethical experimentation at the Priory Clinic in Roehampton.  How better to indulge in unethical procedures than to ensure that PPP or BUPA pay for such treatment, and that normal NHS procedures are not followed in a private institution? My ex husband’s own GP’s had no professed knowledge of his mental ill health throughout the time of Dr T*******’s treatment of him. How better to ensure that all the tentacles of the establishment were ranged against me than to invoke this secret brotherhood to protect one of their own, the Lewis son of a member of Grand Lodge?  Since others who claim not to be masons, but to have worked for military intelligence have also entered the arena I can only surmise that the experiments being carried out at the Priory Clinic in Roehampton had some sort of establishment sanction.
Masonic Tricks
Even decent Masons could often be ‘conned’ into providing information on the basis that ‘Brother Smith needs this to help the person involved’. The adversary would even sometimes be described as a fellow Mason to the Brother from whom information was sought perhaps someone with access to his bank manager or employer. The ‘good’ Mason would not go to any lengths of checking with Freemasons Hall whether or not this was so. The ‘target’ was presented as a Brother in distress by a fellow Mason, especially a fellow Lodge member, that would be enough for any upright member of the Craft.  Sometimes this information gathering process – often involving a long chain of Masonic contacts all over the country and possibly abroad – would be unnecessary. Enough would be known in advance about the adversary to initiate any desired action against him.  I asked how this ‘action’ might be taken.  ‘Solicitors are very good at it’, said Christopher [alledged Senior Whitehall Civil Servant and Freemason]. ‘Get your man involved in something legal – it need not be serious – and you have him’.  Masonic police can harass, arrest on false charges, and plant evidence. ‘A businessman in a small community or person in public office arrested for dealing in child pornography, for indecent exposure, or for trafficking in drugs is at the end of the line’, said Christopher. ‘He will never work again’.
More Masonic Tricks!
Masons can bring about the situation where credit companies and banks withdraw credit facilities from individual clients and tradesmen, said my informant. Banks can foreclose. People who rely on the telephone for their work can be cut off for long periods. Masonic employees of local authorities can arrange for a person’s drains to be inspected and extensive damage to be reported, thus burdening the person with huge repair bills; workmen carrying out the job can ‘find’ in reality cause – further damage. Again with regard to legal matters, a fair hearing is hard to get when a man in ordinary circumstances is in financial difficulties. If he is trying to fight a group of unprincipled Freemasons skilled in using the ‘network’ it will be impossible because Masonic Department of Health and Social Security and Law Society officials can delay applications for Legal Aid endlessly.

‘Employers, if they are Freemasons or not, can be given private information about a man who has made himself an enemy of Masonry.  At worst he will be dismissed or consistently passed over for promotion’.

Christopher added, ‘Masonic doctors can also be used. But for some reason doctors seem to be the least corruptible men’

‘Only the fighters have any hope of beating the system once it’s at work
 against them’, he told me. ‘Most people, fighters or not, are beaten in the end, though. It’s … you see, I … you finish up not knowing who you can trust. You can get no help because your story sounds so paranoid that you are thought a crank, one of those nuts who think the whole world is a conspiracy against them.’

I am NOT mad!
I do know that the mad often consider themselves to be the only sane people around and this story might receive that interpretation. I have tried to represent the facts, as I see them, as a simple sum of 2 + 2. The conclusion, if I’ve been able to reach it at all, is a simple 4, not a gross.

When members of the secret societies baulk at the lengths they are expected to go they find themselves up against the system. A system which they now know is so powerful that they cannot hope to physically survive outside it, nor can they survive spiritually within it. Masons would have you believe that they are keepers of deep secrets of mystical proportions. Mystical truths in the hands of evil idiots become mumbo jumbo. There cannot be any great mystical or supernatural power on which they draw. Self-seeking weasel like cowards and chisellers are never granted mystical powers. They can however rely on a wide reaching secret organisation which ensures that its members attain the highest offices in the land. A scam used successfully to hoodwink us all.

I can only wait for the political and judicial climate to change sufficiently to allow me to ask for protection.  However when the forces of law and order no longer work to protect those who suffer from conspiracies to kill them we can only hope to survive long enough to tell our stories.  Until that time comes there is no hope of protection